3D TV is long gone, but could it make a comeback? Will we be donning our 3D glasses once more?

Do you remember the sought-after 3D TVs? If not, that's okay because they didn't stay fashionable for very long, and most companies stopped manufacturing them years ago.

The death of 3D TVs was sad for those who enjoyed the technology, but is it possible for 3D TVs and 3D films to make a comeback in the future?

Let's jump into what exactly a 3D TV is, what caused their demise, and if virtual reality was the final nail in the coffin for 3D.

What Exactly Is a 3D TV?

Watching 3D TV and films dates back an incredibly long time. In fact, the earliest 3D movie shown to a cinema audience was "The Power of Love." This happened in 1922—100 years ago!

3D movies weren't new, but the sudden surge of 3D TVs in the home was. For those young enough not to remember the 3D craze around 2009, this is how a 3D TV works.

3D TVs appear the way they do because of stereoscopy or stereoscopic imaging, a technique that tricks our eyes into seeing an image with a 3D depth. Both our eyes see two slightly different views of the world, but our brain is clever enough to put them together into one image. That's basically what 3D TVs do. You put on the glasses and see two different images from slightly different angles on the screen, and your brain merges them to create a single 3D picture.

Movies shot in 2D and 3D turned out to be ridiculously expensive and time-consuming. This meant that many movies were converted after being filmed in 2D, and only a handful of scenes were actually in 3D. In the end, only about half of a movie or less was actually in 3D, which was usually a massive letdown.

MAKEUSEOF VIDEO OF THE DAY

What Made 3D TVs Fail?

Many issues doomed 3D TVs from the start. Some of the most notable ones were the 3D glasses, the additional costs, and the at-home viewing experience.

The glasses were bizarre and a lot of people thought they were annoying to wear. They also came with a myriad of other compatibility problems, causing issues for those with glasses or other visual impairments.

Furthermore, to make full use of your 3D TV, there were usually additional costs, such as buying a suitable Blu-ray player and a pair of 3D glasses for everyone who was watching.

Another problem was that the home viewing experience was disappointing compared to watching an immersive 3D movie at the cinema. That is what likely doomed 3D TVs.

As of 2021, some 3D films are still played in some locations around the globe. However, in 2021, IMAX announced that it would no longer show 3D movies. The reason for leaving 3D behind could be the excessive cost to make the movies, or perhaps a standard IMAX experience is far more worthwhile nowadays.

What's Ahead for 3D TV Fans?

As much as 3D has failed, there are still so many people who are huge fans of 3D TVs and were sad to see it go. So, does that mean there will be a resurrection of 3D TV in the future?

Because it's been around for so long, it could indeed make a comeback in movie theaters, but it's hard to say if 3D will ever suit a home viewing experience. There has been a lot of talk about 3D televisions where viewers won't have to wear unconventional 3D glasses. 3D TV and films without glasses are a possibility, and there have been demonstrations of glasses-free televisions at CES (the massive consumer tech expo held in Las Vegas each year), like the prototype Samsung 8K 3D TV from 2015. However, none have caught on because of a few problems.

The main problem was that without wearing the 3D glasses, you'd have to sit or stand in just the right position in front of the TV without moving around. If you're not positioned in exactly the right spot, the picture changes, and the 3D effect doesn't work accurately.

There are already some smartphones that have 3D displays and cameras. And let's not forget about the Nintendo 3DS, the classic handheld that lets you play 3D games, all without the silly glasses. The Nintendo 3DS was successful, but they did stop manufacturing it because a better console came along, of course. That fact alone begs the question: do we need 3D in our lives? 3D was a fad, and the truth is that fads are short-lived.

Should We Focus on the Latest TV Tech Instead of 3D?

Image Credit: LG전자/Flickr

For now, some of the latest TV technologies are OLED, QLED, 4K, and 8K. For the most part, people are more than happy with the latest TV tech and have no desire to own a 3D TV.

8K TVs are on the rise at the moment. Some say they're not necessary for an ordinary person's living room. However, you'll want to upgrade to an 8K TV in the future. Presently, QLED and OLED televisions are the most in-demand. OLED and QLED TVs have gained popularity and become a lot more affordable. They offer a range of amazing features, like vivid, bright colors and a wide viewing angle. OLED and QLED TVs are also incredibly thin and lightweight. Did you know Sony and Samsung announced a new QD-OLED TV display at CES 2022?

Meanwhile, 4K TVs have been popular for quite some time and were introduced just as 3D TVs slowly faded away. Were 3D TVs forgotten because it's so easy and convenient to watch something in 4K rather than 3D?

The fact of the matter is that sitting down and turning on the TV is so simple compared to all the extra bits and pieces you need for a 3D experience, including the tiresome glasses, extra costs, additional players, and so on.

Will VR Take Over the 3D Experience?

According to statistics, 57.4 million people in the United States use virtual reality. That's a huge sign that VR is becoming more and more commonplace every year.

So while 3D fizzled out fairly quickly, virtual reality continues to grow and grow, proving that it's not just a craze. VR and 3D are by no means the same thing, but VR can give us the fun, immersive experience we're looking for.

VR headsets range from simple cardboard cut-outs to high-tech LCD screen glasses. All of them work similarly, by using a split image or video with an individual view for each eye. VR tech allows you to fully envelop yourself in a three-dimensional virtual simulation by blocking out the outside world.

With virtual reality now introduced across so many industries already, do we need 3D technology in our lives?

Are 3D TVs Really Dead and Gone for Good?

Would 3D TVs still be around today if they were introduced at a better time, with lower costs and improved technology? Honestly, it's hard to say. There are so many different factors in play, and there was no single thing that led to the demise of 3D TV and films.

When it comes to technology, things come and go at a rapid pace. It's hard to predict if 3D TVs will rise from the dead in the future. The bottom line is that 3D TVs failed, but 3D technology comes and goes roughly every 10 years, so it could be back again soon.

What Is QD-OLED and Why Is It Better Than OLED or LCD TVs?

Read Next

Share Share Tweet Share Email

About The Author

Christine Romans (67 Articles Published) Christine is a content creator with over five years of experience writing about tech as well as a ridiculously wide range of other topics. She is a proud home cook, plant mom, and self-proclaimed wine taster. More From Christine Romans

Subscribe to our newsletter Join our newsletter for tech tips, reviews, free ebooks, and exclusive deals! Click here to subscribe

3D TV Is Dead—What You Need To Know

Let's not beat around the bush: 3D TV is dead. It's sad news for those who are 3D fans, but it's time to face facts. No 3D TVs are being made. In fact, most manufacturers stopped making them in 2016.

The Avatar Effect

Before getting into the "why it all failed," it's important to know why it even started. It's something the "Avatar Effect".

Although 3D movie viewing goes back decades, the release of James Cameron's Avatar in 2009 was a game-changer. With its worldwide 3D success, movie studios not only started pumping out a steady stream of 3D movies into movie theaters but TV makers, beginning with Panasonic and LG, made 3D available for home viewing with the introduction of 3D TV. However, that was the beginning of several mistakes.

So, What Happened?

A lot of things came together to doom 3D TV before it really even started, which can be summed up by three factors:

Unfortunate Timing

Expensive and Incompatible Glasses

Extra Costs

Let's take a look at these three and other issues that plagued 3D TVs from the start.

Lifewire / Theresa Chiechi

The Poorly Timed Introduction of 3D TV

The first mistake was the timing of its introduction. The U.S. had just gone through a major consumer buying disruption with the implementation of the 2009 DTV transition, in which all over-the-air TV broadcasting switched from analog to digital.

As a result, between 2007 and 2009 millions of consumers either purchased new HDTVs to meet the "new" broadcast requirements or analog-to-digital TV broadcast converters so that they could keep their older analog TVs working a little while longer. This meant that when 3D TV was introduced in 2010, most consumers were not ready to discard their just-purchased TVs, and reach into their wallets again, just to get 3D.

The Glasses

Bad timing was just the first mistake. To view the 3D effect on a TV you had to wear special glasses. And, get this, there were competing standards that determined which glasses you had to use, including passive polarized and active shutter.

Some TV makers (led by Panasonic and Samsung) adopted a system referred to as "active shutter". In this system, viewers had to wear glasses that used shutters that alternately opened and closed, synchronized with alternately displayed left and right eye images on the TV to create the 3D effect. However, other manufacturers (led by LG and Vizio) adopted a system referred to as "passive polarized", in which the TV displayed both the left and right images at the same time, and the required glasses used polarization to provide the 3D effect.

However, a major problem was that the glasses used with each system were not interchangeable. If you owned a 3D TV that required active glasses, you could not use passive glasses or vice versa. To make matters worse, even though you could use the same passive glasses with any 3D TV that used that system, with TVs that used the active shutter system, you couldn't necessarily use the same glasses with different brands. This meant that glasses for Panasonic 3D TVs might not work with a Samsung 3D TV as the sync requirements were different.

Another problem with 3D glasses was the cost. Although passive glasses were inexpensive, active shutter glasses were very expensive (sometimes as high as $100 a pair). For a family of 4 or more or if a family regularly hosted a movie night that cost was pretty high.

Extra Costs (You Needed More Than Just a 3D TV)

Uh-oh, more costs ahead! In addition to a 3D TV and correct glasses, to access a true 3D viewing experience, consumers needed to invest in a 3D-enabled Blu-ray Disc player and/or buy or lease a new 3D-enabled cable/satellite box. Also, with internet streaming starting to take off, you needed to make sure that your new 3D TV was compatible with any internet services that offered 3D streaming.

In addition, for those that had a setup where video signals were routed through a home theater receiver, a new receiver would be required that was compatible with 3D video signals from any connected 3D Blu-ray Disc player, cable/satellite box, etc.

The 2D-to-3D Conversion Mess

Realizing that some consumers might not want to purchase all the other gear needed for a true 3D viewing experience, TV makers decided to include the capability of 3D TVs to perform real-time 2D-to-3D conversion—Big Mistake!

Although this allowed consumers to watch existing 2D content in 3D right out the box, the 3D viewing experience was poor—definitely inferior to viewing actual 3D.

3D Is Dim

Another problem with 3D TV is that 3D images are much dimmer than 2D images. As a result, TV makers made the big mistake of not incorporating increased light output technologies into 3D TVs to compensate.

However, what is ironic, is that with the introduction of HDR technology in 2015, TVs began to be made with increased light output capability. This would have benefited the 3D viewing experience, but in a counter-intuitive move, TV makers decided to dump the 3D viewing option, focusing their efforts on implementing HDR and improving 4K resolution performance, without keeping 3D in the mix.

3D, Live TV, and Streaming

3D is very difficult to implement for live TV. In order to provide 3D TV programming, two channels are required, so that standard TV owners could still watch a program normally on one channel, in addition to those wanting to watch in 3D on another. This meant increased cost for broadcast networks to provide separate feeds to local stations, and for local stations to maintain two separate channels for transmission to viewers.

Although multiple channels are easier to execute on cable/satellite, many consumers were not interested in paying any extra required fees, so offerings were limited. After an initial number of 3D cable and satellite offerings, ESPN, DirecTV, and others dropped out.

However, Vudu and some other internet streaming content channels still provide some 3D content, but how long that will last is anyone's guess.

Problems at the Retail Sales Level

Another reason 3D failed was the poor retail sales experience.

At first, there was a lot of sales hype and 3D demonstrations, but after the initial push, if you walked into a lot of retailers looking for a 3D TV, the salespeople no longer provided well-informed presentations, and 3D glasses were often missing or, in the case of active shutter glasses, not charged or missing batteries.

The result was that consumers that may have been interested in buying a 3D TV would just walk out of the store, not knowing what was available, how it worked, how to best optimize a 3D TV for the best viewing experience, and what else they needed to watch 3D movies at home.

Also, sometimes it was not communicated well that all 3D TVs can display images in standard 2D. In other words, you can use a 3D TV just like any other TV in cases where 3D content is not available if 2D viewing is desired or more appropriate.

Not Everyone Likes 3D

For a variety of reasons, not everyone likes 3D. If you are viewing with other family members or friends, and one of them doesn't want to watch 3D, they will just see two overlapping images on the screen.

Sharp offered glasses that could convert 3D back to 2D, but that required an optional purchase and, if one of the reasons that the person didn't want to watch 3D was because they didn't like wearing glasses, having to use a different type of glasses to watch 2D TV, while others are watching the same TV in 3D was a non-starter.

Watching 3D on a TV Is Not the Same as a Video Projector

Unlike going to the local cinema or using a home theater video projector and screen, the 3D viewing experience on a TV is not the same.

Although not everyone likes watching 3D regardless of whether it is at a movie theater or at home, consumers, in general, are more accepting of 3D as a movie-going experience. Also, in the home environment, watching 3D using a video projector (which are still available) and a large screen, provides a more acceptable cinematic experience for many. Viewing 3D on a TV, unless on a large screen or sitting close, is like viewing through a small window – the field of view is much more narrow, resulting in a less than desirable 3D experience

There Is No 4K 3D

Another setback was the decision not to include 3D into 4K standards, so, by the time the 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray disc format was introduced in late 2015, there was no provision for implementing 3D on 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray Discs, and no indication from movie studios to support such a feature.

What the End of 3D TV Means Going Forward

In the short term, there are still millions of 3D TVs in use in the U.S. and around the world (3D TV is still big in China and to some extent in Europe), so movies and other content will still be released on 3D Blu-ray for the near future. In fact, even though 3D is not a part of the Ultra HD Blu-ray Disc format, most players play 3D Blu-ray Discs.

If you have a 3D-enabled Blu-ray or Ultra HD Blu-ray disc player, and a 3D TV, you will still be able to play your current discs, as well as any forthcoming 3D Blu-ray disc releases. There are about 450 3D Blu-ray Disc movie titles available, with more in the short-term pipeline. Most of the best 3D Blu-ray Disc movies also come packaged with a standard 2D Blu-ray version.

Disney and Paramount are no longer marketing movies on 3D Blu-ray Disc in the U.S., but they are available in other select markets. This means that you may have to purchase them from international sources. If you do, make sure they are region code compatible with your player and that they have an English soundtrack or subtitles.

Looking at the long-term, 3D TV could make a comeback. The technology can be re-implemented at any time and modified for 4K, HDR, or other TV technologies, if TV makers, content providers, and TV broadcasters wish it to be so. Also, the development of 3D without glasses continues, with ever-improving results.

Would 3D TV have been successful if TV makers would have given more thought about timing, market demand, technical issues regarding product performance, and consumer communication? Perhaps, or perhaps not, but several major mistakes were made and it appears that 3D TV may have run its course.

The Bottom Line

In consumer electronics, things come and go, such as BETA, Laserdisc, and HD-DVD, CRT, Rear-Projection, and Plasma TVs, with Curved Screen TVs now showing signs of fading away. Also, the future of VR (Virtual Reality), which requires bulky headgear, is still not cemented. However, if vinyl records can make an unexpected big comeback, who is to say that 3D TV won't revive at some point?

In the "meantime", for those that own and like 3D products and content, keep everything working. For those that desire to purchase a 3D TV or 3D Video projector, buy one while you still can—you may still find some 3D TVs on clearance, and most home theater video projectors still provide the 3D viewing option.

Extra Bonus for 3D Fans

The Samsung 85-inch UN85JU7100 4K Ultra HD 3D-capable TV is a 2015 model that may still be available through a few retailers from any remaining inventory from a limited production run through 2017.

No Samsung 2016 (models with a K), 2017 (models with an M), or 2018 (models with an N) at this point is 3D capable. Whatever 2015 model supply (signified by a J) is in the pipeline is what is left, unless Samsung announces otherwise. If you have room for an 85-inch TV, and you are a 3D fan, the Samsung UN85JU7100 may be a limited-time opportunity.

Another remaining option is the 65-inch Sony XBR65Z9D 4K Ultra HD TV with a 3D viewing option which is a 2016 model that is also still available on a limited basis.

If you are a die-hard 3D fan, check out the continuing 3D Blu-ray Disc reviews on the website and network with other fans from around the world at the 3D Blu-ray Movie Enthusiast Group on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions